U.S. v. Russo, 2:19-CR-00092-DB-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190610b12
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Defendant JOHN A. RUSSO may have additional time within which to provide a wet ink copy of a signed Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge In a Misdemeanor Case. Therefore, the last day for Defendant to provide a wet ink copy of the signed document is by close of business June 14, 2019. Good cause exists
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Defendant JOHN A. RUSSO may have additional time within which to provide a wet ink copy of a signed Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge In a Misdemeanor Case. Therefore, the last day for Defendant to provide a wet ink copy of the signed document is by close of business June 14, 2019. Good cause exists ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME
DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Defendant JOHN A. RUSSO may have additional time within which to provide a wet ink copy of a signed Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge In a Misdemeanor Case. Therefore, the last day for Defendant to provide a wet ink copy of the signed document is by close of business June 14, 2019.
Good cause exists for this extension as Defense Counsel in good faith incorrectly represented Mr. Russo's ability to provide a wet ink copy of his signature. Mr. Russo was not present in court, in accordance with Rule 43. Upon contacting Mr. Russo after court, Defense Counsel was provided with an electronic copy of the Consent, which has been provided to the court.However, Mr. Russo's international travel prevents him from providing the court with the wet ink signature in the previously ordered time. Defense Counsel informed the Court's Courtroom Deputy and submitted this stipulation and order as soon as possible after the timing issue became known.
This document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for Defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) Plaintiff's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered.
Respectfully Submitted,
DATED: June 6, 2019 By: /s/ Ashley J. Bargenquast
Ashley J. Bargenquast
Attorney for Defendant
Tully & Weiss Attorneys at Law
DATED: June 6, 2019 By: /s/ Christopher S. Hales
Christopher S. Hales
Attorney for Plaintiff
Assistant United States Attorney
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant should provide a wet ink copy of the signed Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge In a Misdemeanor Case by close of business June 14, 2019.
Source: Leagle