Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wooten v. Butte County, 2:19-CV-0940-JAM-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190610b26 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff's applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 3 and 6). Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless spec
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff's applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 3 and 6). Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the court to do so.

Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 3 and 6) are granted; and

2. This matter is referred back to the District Judge.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer