Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fillmore v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02470-DB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190612995 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2019
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920; AND ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE DEBORAH BARNES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Haley J. Fillmore be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the am
More

AMENDED STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920; AND ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE DEBORAH BARNES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Haley J. Fillmore be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of two thousand seven hundred twenty dollars and eighteen cents ($2,720.18) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Haley J. Fillmore, the government will consider the matter of Haley J. Fillmore's assignment of EAJA fees to Cyrus Safa. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Haley J. Fillmore, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Haley J. Fillmore does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Haley J. Fillmore.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Cyrus Safa.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Haley J. Fillmore's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Haley J. Fillmore and/or Cyrus Safa including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Cyrus Safa and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

DATE: May 22, 2019 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Cyrus Safa BY: __________________ Cyrus Safa Attorney for plaintiff Haley J. Fillmore McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney /s/ Ben A. Porter BEN A. PORTER Attorneys for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization)

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury Offset Program.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer