Filed: Jun. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 29, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations ("F&Rs") herein which were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the F&Rs were
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 29, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations ("F&Rs") herein which were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the F&Rs were t..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 29, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations ("F&Rs") herein which were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the F&Rs were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 50. Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 53.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the F&Rs to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The F&Rs filed October 29, 2018 (ECF No. 50), are ADOPTED in full;
2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED and Claims One through Four of the amended petition are DISMISSED as untimely; and
3. Respondent is directed to answer Claims Five and Six of the amended petition within sixty (60) days. The answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. See Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner may file a reply within thirty (30) days of service of the answer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.