Gonzalez v. JAG Trucking, Inc., 1:18-cv-01046 LJO JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190619866
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CROSS-ACTION (Doc. 35) FILED BY GILBERTO VIZCAINO RODRIGUEZ AND ANA PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ (Doc. 101) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Gilberto Vizcaino Rodriguez and Ana Patricia Rodriguez have filed a notice of voluntary dismissal (Doc. 101) of their cross-complaint brought against JAG Trucking and Joshua Nicholson (Doc. 35). Neither cross-defendant have answered the cross-complaint or otherwise responded to it. Thus, according to Fed. R. Civ.P. 41, the dismissal is ef
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CROSS-ACTION (Doc. 35) FILED BY GILBERTO VIZCAINO RODRIGUEZ AND ANA PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ (Doc. 101) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Gilberto Vizcaino Rodriguez and Ana Patricia Rodriguez have filed a notice of voluntary dismissal (Doc. 101) of their cross-complaint brought against JAG Trucking and Joshua Nicholson (Doc. 35). Neither cross-defendant have answered the cross-complaint or otherwise responded to it. Thus, according to Fed. R. Civ.P. 41, the dismissal is eff..
More
ORDER CLOSING CROSS-ACTION (Doc. 35) FILED BY GILBERTO VIZCAINO RODRIGUEZ AND ANA PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ
(Doc. 101)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Gilberto Vizcaino Rodriguez and Ana Patricia Rodriguez have filed a notice of voluntary dismissal (Doc. 101) of their cross-complaint brought against JAG Trucking and Joshua Nicholson (Doc. 35). Neither cross-defendant have answered the cross-complaint or otherwise responded to it. Thus, according to Fed. R. Civ.P. 41, the dismissal is effective without an order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. Thus, according to Fed. R. Civ.P. 41, the dismissal is effective without an order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this cross-action in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
