Lutz v. Saul, 2:19-cv-00024-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190619954
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION FOR 45 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment be extended forty-five (45) days until August 1, 2019. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff's counsel requires additional time to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief because the administrative record i
Summary: STIPULATION FOR 45 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment be extended forty-five (45) days until August 1, 2019. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff's counsel requires additional time to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief because the administrative record is..
More
STIPULATION FOR 45 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment be extended forty-five (45) days until August 1, 2019. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Plaintiff's counsel requires additional time to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief because the administrative record is extremely long, consisting of more than 7,500 pages, about 7,000 of which are medical treatment reports. Plaintiff's counsel also has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's brief in accordance with the current scheduling order due to counsel's conflicting deadlines in unrelated matters, including briefing of an appeal to the Ninth Circuit, handling of two state court motions for summary judgment, and associated depositions. With the Court's approval, the parties further stipulate that all other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order be extended accordingly.
Dated: June 17, 2019 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Jared T. Walker
Jared T. Walker,
Attorney for Plaintiff
SO STIPULATED:
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
Dated: June 17, 2019 By: /s/ Tina Naicker*
(*authorized by e-mail on 6/17/2019)
Tina Naicker
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
