Rangel v. City of Modesto, 1:19-cv-00638-LJO-SAB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190628980
Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (ECF No. 6) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On June 27, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation under Local Rule 144(a) agreeing to a fourteen-day extension to file a responsive pleading in this action. (ECF No. 6.) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before July 10, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
(ECF No. 6)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On June 27, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation under Local Rule 144(a) agreeing to a fourteen-day extension to file a responsive pleading in this action. (ECF No. 6.) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before July 10, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
