U.S. v. Williams, 2:05-CR-00477-WBS. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190701818
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF ADMIT DENY HEARING; [ PROPOSED ] ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, the Admit Deny Hearing in this matter was set for July 1, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Admit Deny Hearing until July 8, 2019. 3. The parties re
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF ADMIT DENY HEARING; [ PROPOSED ] ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, the Admit Deny Hearing in this matter was set for July 1, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Admit Deny Hearing until July 8, 2019. 3. The parties req..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF ADMIT DENY HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, the Admit Deny Hearing in this matter was set for July 1, 2019.
2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Admit Deny Hearing until July 8, 2019.
3. The parties request a continuance to allow defense counsel additional time to continue his investigation and witness interviews, and to allow the parties to continue to negotiate a resolution.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle