Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, 2:13-cv-934-JAM-DB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190710699 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO LIFT STAY AND ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . This stipulation to lift the stay of this litigation is entered into by Plaintiffs Conservation Congress and the Citizens For Better Forestry and Federal Defendants the United States Forest Service ("USFS") and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS"). By and through counsel, the parties state as follows: WHEREAS on May 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed the complaint initiating this litigation, alleging violations of
More

STIPULATION TO LIFT STAY AND ORDER

This stipulation to lift the stay of this litigation is entered into by Plaintiffs Conservation Congress and the Citizens For Better Forestry and Federal Defendants the United States Forest Service ("USFS") and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS"). By and through counsel, the parties state as follows:

WHEREAS on May 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed the complaint initiating this litigation, alleging violations of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), the National Environmental Policy Act, and the National Forest Management Act in connection with the Pettijohn Late Successional Reserve Habitat Improvement and Fuels Reduction Project ("Pettijohn Project") located in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest;

WHEREAS on June 27, 2013, the USFS requested additional consultation with the FWS on the Pettijohn Project pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA;

WHEREAS on July 8, 2013, the Court stayed this case on stipulation of the parties to allow for the USFS and FWS to complete the reinitiated section 7 consultation process and any attendant administrative process otherwise required by law;

WHEREAS on April 13, 2018, FWS issued a new superseding Biological Opinion and concluded the reinitated consultation;

WHEREAS the parties submitted several joint status reports since that time, the most recent of which proposed deadlines for certain preliminary matters, including moving to lift the stay.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS:

1. Upon entry of the Court's Order approving this Stipulation, the stay will be lifted. 2. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within 84 days of the Court's Order lifting the stay. 3. Federal Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint within 42 days of Plaintiffs filing of the amended complaint. 4. Federal Defendants shall lodge the administrative records within 28 days of responding to the amended complaint. 5. The parties shall file a joint proposed briefing schedule to address any motions related to the administrative record and cross motions for summary judgment within 21 days of the lodging of the administrative record. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: July 3, 2019 /s/ Sean T. Malone Sean T. Malone, OR Bar # 084060 Attorney at Law 259 E. 5th Ave, Ste 200-C Eugene OR 97401 (303) 859-0403 seanmalone8@hotmail.com Attorney for Plaintiffs LAWRENCE VANDYKE, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division /s/ Shaun M. Pettigrew SHAUN M. PETTIGREW Trial Attorney Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044 7611 (202) 305-3895 RICKEY D. TURNER, JR. Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section 999 18th Street South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 844-1373 Attorneys for Federal Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer