Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ramos v. Saul, 2:18-cv-00060-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190710723 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until July 31, 2019, in which to e-file her Reply to the Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court briefs due (sixteen opening briefs and five reply briefs due). Plaintiff makes
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until July 31, 2019, in which to e-file her Reply to the Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's schedule of administrative hearing and district court briefs due (sixteen opening briefs and five reply briefs due). Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief.

Dated: July 1, 2019 /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff SALLY RAMOS Dated: July 1, 2019 /s/CAROL S. CLARK CAROL S. CLARK Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration

IT IS ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. As of June 4, 2019, Andrew M. Saul is the Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, he is substituted as Defendant. No further action needs to be taken by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer