Markham v. Tehachapi Unified School District, 1:15-cv-01835 LJO JLT. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190711837
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 80) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with fees and costs to be paid consistent with the arbitrator's decision and the Court allowing no further fees or costs. (Doc. 80) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order "by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
Summary: ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 80) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with fees and costs to be paid consistent with the arbitrator's decision and the Court allowing no further fees or costs. (Doc. 80) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order "by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ..
More
ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION
(Doc. 80)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with fees and costs to be paid consistent with the arbitrator's decision and the Court allowing no further fees or costs. (Doc. 80) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order "by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, though the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
