Filed: Jul. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW DEFENDANT HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES ON PLAINTIFF [F.R.C.P. Rule 33; Rule 26] ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiff, JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS and defendant, HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., by and through their respective counsel, that defendant HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., may propound an additional 15 interrogatories on the plaintiff designed to ascertain plaintiff's economic damages. This Stipulation
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW DEFENDANT HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES ON PLAINTIFF [F.R.C.P. Rule 33; Rule 26] ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiff, JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS and defendant, HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., by and through their respective counsel, that defendant HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., may propound an additional 15 interrogatories on the plaintiff designed to ascertain plaintiff's economic damages. This Stipulation ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW DEFENDANT HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., TO PROPOUND ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES ON PLAINTIFF
[F.R.C.P. Rule 33; Rule 26]
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiff, JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS and defendant, HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., by and through their respective counsel, that defendant HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D., may propound an additional 15 interrogatories on the plaintiff designed to ascertain plaintiff's economic damages.
This Stipulation is made on the grounds that there are questions relating to plaintiff's economic damages that plaintiff was unable to answer during his deposition. These additional interrogatories are necessary to ascertain this information, are not designed to annoy, embarrass or oppress the plaintiff, and are consistent with Rule 26(b)(2).
This stipulation may be executed in separate counterparts and/or by facsimile.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.
McELFISH LAW FIRM
By: /s/ Raymond D. McElfish
Raymond D. McElfish
Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS
WASHINGTON & WASHINGTON
By: /s/ George E. Washington
George E. Washington
Peter G. Washington
Attorneys for Defendant
HECTOR LOPEZ, M.D.
ORDER
The parties, having stipulated, and consideration of the moving documents, and good cause appearing,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
