Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Driver v. Kenworth, 2:17-CV-01968-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190718845 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER; AND ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS plaintiff filed his complaint on September 21, 2017. WHEREAS on December 7, 2017 the parties stipulated to dismiss, without prejudice, all defendants except defendant, Pap Trucks, Inc. an Oregon corporation.(See ECF No. 8). WHEREAS the court held a Status (Pre-Trial) Scheduling Conference on March 8, 2018. WHEREAS on March 9, 2018 this court issues its Pre-Trial Scheduling Order which
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER; AND ORDER

WHEREAS plaintiff filed his complaint on September 21, 2017.

WHEREAS on December 7, 2017 the parties stipulated to dismiss, without prejudice, all defendants except defendant, Papé Trucks, Inc. an Oregon corporation.(See ECF No. 8).

WHEREAS the court held a Status (Pre-Trial) Scheduling Conference on March 8, 2018.

WHEREAS on March 9, 2018 this court issues its Pre-Trial Scheduling Order which indicated, among other things, "... that this order shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause...."

WHEREAS the court has previously modified the Scheduling Order to accommodate the parties' need for additional time to complete discovery.

WHEREAS on June 27, 2019, Jomar Investments, Inc. dba New Life Transport Parts Center was brought in as a third party defendant and will soon be entering an appearance.

WHEREAS the parties have put discovery on hold, such as plaintiff's deposition, so that the new party may participate once their appearance is entered.

WHEREAS the parties, including but not limited to the new third party defendant, will not be in a postion to try this case in January 2020.

WHEREAS the parties have agreed and stipulated, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, that the current scheduling order be vacated and that once the new party enters an appearance, a Status Scheduling Conference be scheduled on September 23, 2019, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the court so that a new scheduling order may be issued to accommodate the needs of all parties.

DATED: July 11, 2019 ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT /S/ Rebecca L. Menendez By ___________________________________ CHARLES S. PAINTER REBECCA L. MENENDEZ Attorneys for Defendant, PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC. DATED: July 11, 2019 CUTTER LAW P.C. /S/ Celine E. Cutter By ____________________________________ C. BROOKS CUTTER CELINE E. CUTTER Attorneys for Plaintiff, ROGER DRIVER.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer