Nicklas v. Kokor, 1:18-cv-00119-LJO-EPG (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190722629
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF NOS. 29, 30, 33, & 43) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Steve Rocky Nicklas ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 18, 2019, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference ("Conference"). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Derrek Lee telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants. For the reasons state
Summary: ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF NOS. 29, 30, 33, & 43) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Steve Rocky Nicklas ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 18, 2019, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference ("Conference"). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Derrek Lee telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants. For the reasons stated..
More
ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
(ECF NOS. 29, 30, 33, & 43)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Steve Rocky Nicklas ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 18, 2019, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference ("Conference"). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Derrek Lee telephonically appeared on behalf of Defendants.
For the reasons stated on the record at the Conference, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's further compliance1 with the initial disclosures requirement (ECF No. 19) is waived.
2. Plaintiff's requests for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 29, 30, & 43) are denied without prejudice.
3. Plaintiff's request for a case status report (ECF No. 43) is denied as moot.
4. Plaintiff's request for conference statements in transcript (ECF No. 33) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff disclosed witnesses and documents on the record at the Conference.
Source: Leagle
