Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Her v. Saul, 1:18-cv-01218-SKO. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190723975 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 (Doc. 22) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Chue Hue Her be awarded attorney fees in the amount of four thousand three hundred dollars ($4,300.00) and under the Equal Access to J
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

(Doc. 22)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Chue Hue Her be awarded attorney fees in the amount of four thousand three hundred dollars ($4,300.00) and under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Her, the government will consider the matter of Her's assignment of EAJA fees to Young Cho. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Her, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Her does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Her.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Young Cho.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Her's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Her and/or Young Cho including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Young Cho and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

DATE: July 17, 2019 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Young Cho BY: __________________ Young Cho Attorney for plaintiff Chue Hue Her DATE: July XX, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney /s/ Ellinor Coder _______________________________________ ELLINOR CODER Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization)

ORDER

Based upon the parties' above "Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Attorney Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Costs Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920" (the "Stipulation") (Doc. 22), attorney's fees in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED dollars ($4,300.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of ZERO dollars ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, shall be awarded, subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury Offset Program.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer