Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clyde v. Lippert, 2:16-cv-01166-MCE-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190808893 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On June 20, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. N
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On June 20, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 20, 2019, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Goldsmith's unopposed motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 35) is granted; and

3. This action proceeds as against defendant Lippert only.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer