Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clark v. City of Sacramento, 2:19-cv-00171-JAM (EFB). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190812489 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS STEPHEN CLARK'S STATE LAW CLAIMS FOR RELIEF JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: The Court, having considered the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal of Stephen Clark's State Law Claims for Relief, and good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Stephen Clark's state law claims, including his false arrest/false imprisonment (7 th claim for relief), Battery (8 th claim for relief), Neglig
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS STEPHEN CLARK'S STATE LAW CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

The Court, having considered the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal of Stephen Clark's State Law Claims for Relief, and good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Stephen Clark's state law claims, including his false arrest/false imprisonment (7th claim for relief), Battery (8th claim for relief), Negligence (9th claim for relief) and Bane Act (11th claim for relief) claims, with prejudice, from the instant action. All parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

This order does not in any way affect Plaintiff Stephen Clark's federal Substantive Due Process claim (4th claim for relief), does not in any way affect any of Plaintiff Se'Quette Clark's federal claims or state law claims, and does not in any way affect Plaintiff Sequita Eddy Thompson's and/or Plaintiff Tommy Lee Thompson's state law claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer