Haraszewski v. Knipp, 2:13-cv-2494 JAM DB P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190821984
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants retaliated against him, interfered with his mail, placed him in segregation as a punitive measure, and deprived him of his property. On August 14, 2019, defendants filed a motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR project. After reviewing the motion, the court finds good cause to grant defendants' motion. A
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants retaliated against him, interfered with his mail, placed him in segregation as a punitive measure, and deprived him of his property. On August 14, 2019, defendants filed a motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR project. After reviewing the motion, the court finds good cause to grant defendants' motion. Ac..
More
ORDER
DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants retaliated against him, interfered with his mail, placed him in segregation as a punitive measure, and deprived him of his property. On August 14, 2019, defendants filed a motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR project. After reviewing the motion, the court finds good cause to grant defendants' motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion to opt out (ECF No. 82) is granted and the stay of this action is lifted; and
2. By separate order, the court will set a schedule for this case.
Source: Leagle