Hoffman v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-cv-1609-KJN. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190823a21
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. 636(c); see also ECF No. 5, (Scheduling Order, requesting parties' designation regarding consent within 90 days). Plaintiff is under no obligation to consent, but a consent/decline designation assists the court in determining how the action will be administratively processed. Accordingly, w
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. 636(c); see also ECF No. 5, (Scheduling Order, requesting parties' designation regarding consent within 90 days). Plaintiff is under no obligation to consent, but a consent/decline designation assists the court in determining how the action will be administratively processed. Accordingly, wi..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); see also ECF No. 5, (Scheduling Order, requesting parties' designation regarding consent within 90 days). Plaintiff is under no obligation to consent, but a consent/decline designation assists the court in determining how the action will be administratively processed. Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall file a brief statement indicating whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See ECF No. 5-2 (Consent Form).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
