Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Drake v. Kernan, 1:17-cv-01500-AWI-SAB (PC). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190827744 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND DISMISSING CONSPIRACY CLAIM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE [ECF Nos. 53, 58] ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . Plaintiff Sam Drake is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 21, 2019, the Magistrate Judge i
More

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND DISMISSING CONSPIRACY CLAIM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

[ECF Nos. 53, 58]

Plaintiff Sam Drake is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 21, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, and the conspiracy claims against Defendants Allison and Moak be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 58.) The Findings and Recommendation was served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff filed objections on July 8, 2019.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on June 21, 2019, are adopted in full; 2. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted; and 3. The conspiracy claims against Defendants Allison and Moak are dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer