In re Seizure of 2015 Chevrolet Silverado, Vehicle ID No. 3GCPCREC4FG173943, License Plate No. 68914H2, 1:18-sw-00308-LJO-BAM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190828881
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING UNDER RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (ECF NO. 11) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . This matter concerns Anastasia Purnell's ("Petitioner") Motion for Prompt De Novo Review ("the Motion") of the magistrate judge's June 4, 2019 order denying Petitioner's motion for return of property subject to seizure order. ECF Nos. 10-11. Petitioner filed the Motion on June 12, 2019. ECF No. 11. The government filed its opposition on
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING UNDER RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (ECF NO. 11) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . This matter concerns Anastasia Purnell's ("Petitioner") Motion for Prompt De Novo Review ("the Motion") of the magistrate judge's June 4, 2019 order denying Petitioner's motion for return of property subject to seizure order. ECF Nos. 10-11. Petitioner filed the Motion on June 12, 2019. ECF No. 11. The government filed its opposition on ..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULING UNDER RULE 41 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (ECF NO. 11)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
This matter concerns Anastasia Purnell's ("Petitioner") Motion for Prompt De Novo Review ("the Motion") of the magistrate judge's June 4, 2019 order denying Petitioner's motion for return of property subject to seizure order. ECF Nos. 10-11. Petitioner filed the Motion on June 12, 2019. ECF No. 11. The government filed its opposition on August 1, 2019. ECF No. 13. Petitioner filed a reply on August 26, 2019. ECF No. 16. In an abundance of caution, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the magistrate judge's order under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After carefully analyzing the record, this Court finds the magistrate judge's June 4, 2019 ruling (ECF No. 10) is correct based on the reasoning set forth in the June 4, 2019 order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge's order entered June 4, 2019 (ECF No. 10) is ADOPTED in full; and
2. Petitioner's motion for prompt de novo review of the magistrate judge's June 4, 2019 order (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
