Goins v. Rutherford, 2:18-cv-1750 AC P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190828917
Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On August 13, 2019, this court set a discovery and motion schedule. ECF No. 29. On August 22, 2019, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment contending that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before commencing this action. ECF No. 30. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The deadlin
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On August 13, 2019, this court set a discovery and motion schedule. ECF No. 29. On August 22, 2019, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment contending that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before commencing this action. ECF No. 30. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The deadline..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 13, 2019, this court set a discovery and motion schedule. ECF No. 29. On August 22, 2019, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment contending that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before commencing this action. ECF No. 30. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The deadlines set forth in the discovery and scheduling order filed August 13, 2019, ECF No. 29, are stayed until further notice.
2. Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition to the motion for summary judgment on or before September 12, 2019. See Local Rule 230(1); see also ECF No. 29 at 6-8.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
