Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Yuoni v. Costco Wholesale, 1:18-cv-0684-DAD JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190903b43 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 199) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 29, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above-captioned action is "dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)." (Doc. 19 at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties wh
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION

(Doc. 199)

On August 29, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above-captioned action is "dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)." (Doc. 19 at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer