Tenorio v. Stanislaus County Community Services Agency, 1:19-cv-00752-LJO-EPG. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190904612
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2019
Summary: AMENDED ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 19) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Michael Tenorio, and Defendant, Stanislaus County, which is named in the Amended Complaint as Stanislaus County Community Services Agency (ECF No. 10), have filed a stipulation to dismiss the action without prejudice. (ECF No. 19.) In light of the stipulation, and the previous voluntary dismissal of the other named defendant in this action, California Departme
Summary: AMENDED ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 19) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Michael Tenorio, and Defendant, Stanislaus County, which is named in the Amended Complaint as Stanislaus County Community Services Agency (ECF No. 10), have filed a stipulation to dismiss the action without prejudice. (ECF No. 19.) In light of the stipulation, and the previous voluntary dismissal of the other named defendant in this action, California Departmen..
More
AMENDED ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 19)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Michael Tenorio, and Defendant, Stanislaus County, which is named in the Amended Complaint as Stanislaus County Community Services Agency (ECF No. 10), have filed a stipulation to dismiss the action without prejudice. (ECF No. 19.) In light of the stipulation, and the previous voluntary dismissal of the other named defendant in this action, California Department of Social Services (ECF Nos. 17, 18), the case has ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
