Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wilburn v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-CV-0994-WBS-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190909630 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2019
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pursuant to the court's scheduling order, plaintiff is required to prosecute this action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 45 days from the date of service of the administrative record by defendant. Plaintiff was warned that fail
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Pursuant to the court's scheduling order, plaintiff is required to prosecute this action by either seeking voluntary remand or filing a dispositive motion within 45 days from the date of service of the administrative record by defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. A review of the docket reflects that the answer and certified administrative record were served on July 5, 2019. To date, plaintiff has not filed a dispositive motion.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. See Local Rule 110.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer