McCullough v. Shasta County, 2:19-CV-1739-TLN-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190909640
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the court to do so. Pl
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the court to do so. Pla..
More
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the court to do so.
Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is granted.
Source: Leagle
