Montezuma Harbor, LLC v. Department of the United States Air Force, 2:19-cv-00831-JAM-KJN. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190910683
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND SUBSTITUTE THE UNITED STATES AS THE DEFENDANT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff Montezuma Harbor, LLC and the United States hereby agree and request that the Court set aside the default entered on August 30, 2019, against the Department of the United States Air Force (Dkt. 8). The Department of the Air Force was not in default because the United States had not been served. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(2) (explai
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND SUBSTITUTE THE UNITED STATES AS THE DEFENDANT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff Montezuma Harbor, LLC and the United States hereby agree and request that the Court set aside the default entered on August 30, 2019, against the Department of the United States Air Force (Dkt. 8). The Department of the Air Force was not in default because the United States had not been served. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(2) (explain..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND SUBSTITUTE THE UNITED STATES AS THE DEFENDANT
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Montezuma Harbor, LLC and the United States hereby agree and request that the Court set aside the default entered on August 30, 2019, against the Department of the United States Air Force (Dkt. 8). The Department of the Air Force was not in default because the United States had not been served. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(2) (explaining that service on a federal agency must include service on the United States); id. at 4(i)(1) (explaining that serving the United States includes serving the United States Attorney's Office and the Attorney General). Undersigned counsel for the United States has agreed to accept service of the complaint for the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California by email. Plaintiff will serve the Attorney General by certified mail.
Plaintiff and the United States also agree and request that the Court substitute the United States as the Defendant in place of the Department of the United States Air Force because the United States is the only permissible defendant in a Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit. See F.D.I.C. v. Craft, 157 F.3d 697, 706 (9th Cir. 1998) ("The FTCA is the exclusive remedy for tortious conduct by the United States, and it only allows claims against the United States. Although such claims can arise from the acts or omissions of United States agencies (28 U.S.C. § 2671), an agency itself cannot be sued under the FTCA."). The parties agree that the complaint will be deemed to have been filed against the United States on the date it was originally filed against the Department of the United States Air Force.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: September 6, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
By: /s/ Victoria L. Boesch
VICTORIA L. BOESCH
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States
Dated: September 6, 2019 /s/ Matthew Robert Schoech (authorized (9/6/19)
MATTHEW ROBERT SCHOECH
Schoech Law Group
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle