Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Cea, 2:19-CR-0126 MCE. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190912827 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPLUATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff United States of America ("government"), by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Jaziz Cea ("defendant"), by and through his undersigned counsel of record, Douglas Beevers, Assistant Federal Public Defender, hereby jointly request, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), that the Court approve the parties' stipulation and enter the proposed protective order below ("Protecti
More

STIPLUATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff United States of America ("government"), by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Jaziz Cea ("defendant"), by and through his undersigned counsel of record, Douglas Beevers, Assistant Federal Public Defender, hereby jointly request, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), that the Court approve the parties' stipulation and enter the proposed protective order below ("Protective Order") governing the disclosure by the government of certain documents and materials containing private and sensitive information, including information that relates to and identifies the alleged victims in the investigation, along with the defendant's personally identifying information and employment information. By this stipulation, the parties agree and stipulate as follows:

1. WHEREAS, the defendant is charged in the current complaint with one count of attempted sexual exploitation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a); and possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B).

2. WHEREAS, the government possesses, and in the future may come into possession of, discovery and other materials in this case that contain, among other things, victim-related information, as well as personally identifying information, private financial information, and employment information of the defendant and third parties;

3. WHEREAS, the government wishes to produce and/or make available to the defendant and his counsel the documents and information described above, or similar material that might come into the government's possession in the future, but believes that because of the nature of such documents and information, it is appropriate for the Court to enter a protective order containing the provisions below;

4. WHEREAS, such materials shall be identified as sensitive and subject to a protective order at the time of disclosure, whether on the documents or other materials (e.g., CDs/DVDs) themselves or in an accompanying cover letter;

5. WHEREAS, the parties agree that entry of a stipulated protective order is appropriate, and that a private agreement is not appropriate in light of the nature of the information at issue and the charges in this case; and

6. WHEREAS, the defendant has counsel who wishes the opportunity to review the discovery and other materials; and

7. The parties agree that the ability of defense counsel to adequately advise his client will be enhanced by the approval of this protective order.

The government and the defendant, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to a Protective Order with the following provisions:

1. This Court may enter protective orders pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, its general supervisory authority, and Local Rule 141.1.

2. Some materials to be provided or made available by the government to the defendant as discovery or out of an abundance of caution relate to, or contain private and sensitive information about, alleged victims and individuals other than the defendant, are not public information, and include, but are not limited to: investigative or agency memoranda or reports; victim or witness statements; recorded interviews; private financial information; and other personally-identifying information; and sensitive victim-related information. Accordingly, these discovery materials and all copies thereof should be protected from unnecessary dissemination. This information is collectively referred to as the "Protected Discovery."

3. Such Protected Discovery materials shall be identified as being subject to a protective order at the time of disclosure, whether on the documents or other materials (e.g., CDs/DVDs, documents) themselves or in an accompanying cover letter.

4. The Protected Discovery produced or made available by the government pursuant to this Protective Order may be used by the defendant, the defendant's counsel, and any employees or agents of the defendant's counsel solely in the defense of this case and for no other purpose. The Protected Discovery is now and will forever remain the property of the United States government. The defendant's counsel will return the Protected Discovery to the government or certify that it has been shredded at the conclusion of the case, unless counsel believes he or she is otherwise required by ethical rule or opinion to retain the Protected Discovery. If counsel believes he or she is subject to an ethical rule or opinion requiring retention of the Protected Discovery, he or she shall notify the government of that decision and securely maintain that Protected Discovery consistent with the remaining terms of the Protective Order.

5. The defendant's counsel and the defendant shall not disclose any of the Protected Discovery directly or indirectly to any person except those assisting the defense, persons who are interviewed as potential witnesses, potential experts, or other authorized persons, during the course of the investigation and defense of this case.

6. The Protected Discovery produced by the government shall not be copied or reproduced unless the material is copied or reproduced for authorized persons to assist in the defense, and in the event copies are made, the copies shall be treated in the same manner as the original material.

7. When providing the Protected Discovery materials to an authorized person, the defendant's counsel must inform the authorized person that the materials are provided subject to the terms of this Protective Order, and provide a copy of the Protective Order. The parties agree that defense counsel, defense investigators, and support staff shall not provide the protected discovery to the defendant or any other witness or copies of the Protected Discovery, except for the limited situations identified in this Order.

8. The defendant and his counsel shall store the discovery in a secure place and shall use reasonable care to ensure that it is not disclosed to third persons in violation of the Protective Order.

9. In the event that the defendant obtains substitute counsel, the defendant's undersigned counsel agrees to withhold the Protected Discovery materials from new counsel unless and until substituted counsel agrees to be bound by the Protective Order.

10. The defendant's counsel shall be responsible for advising his or her client, employees, and other members of the defense team of the contents of this Stipulation and the Protective Order.

11. This Stipulation and the Protective Order may be executed through counterpart signatures.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 9, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney CHRISTINA McCALL Assistant United States Attorney Dated: September 9, 2019. DOUGLAS BEEVERS Attorney for JAZIZ CEA

[PROPOSED] ORDER

It is ordered that the parties comply with the following protective order with respect to computer materials alleged to contain child pornography:

a. Upon request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation agents shall make a duplicate copy of the defendant's hard drive(s) and any other storage media available for defense analysis;

b. The duplicate copies of the defendant's hard drive(s) and storage media shall be made available for defense counsel, defense counsel staff, or another member of the defense team(s), and the defendant's proposed computer expert(s) to review at the Federal Bureau of Investigation offices in Roseville, California, for the purpose of preparing for the defense of the above-entitled action. The images on the hard drive and storage media shall not be viewed by any other person;

c. A private room will be provided for the defense examination. No Government agents will be inside the room during the examination, unless requested by the defense attorney or investigator or expert;

d. The expert or defense counsel will be permitted to bring whatever equipment, books, or records he or she believes may be necessary to conduct the examination;

e. Neither the defense expert nor defense attorneys nor the defense counsel staff shall remove the hard drive(s) or other storage media from the confines of the law enforcement office;

f. With the exception of materials which would be considered child pornography under federal law (including visual depictions and data capable of conversion into a visual depiction), the expert or defense counsel may copy files or portions of files, provided the forensic integrity of the hard drive(s) is not altered. The expert or defense counsel will certify in writing (using the attached certification), that he or she has taken no materials which would be considered child pornography, or data capable of being converted into child pornography (under federal law), and that he or she has not caused any child pornography to be sent from the law enforcement premises by any means including by any electronic transfer of files;

g. Except when a defense expert or defense counsel fails to provide this certification, no Government agent, or any person connected with the Government, will examine or acquire in any fashion any of the items used by the expert or defense counsel in order to conduct the defense analysis. Should a defense expert or defense counsel fail to certify that the expert or counsel has not copied or removed child pornography, or data capable of being converted into child pornography, Government agents may then inspect or examine the materials in order to ensure that prohibited child pornography has not been removed;

h. When the defense indicates that it is finished with its review of the copy of the hard drive(s), the drive(s) or other storage devices shall be "wiped" clean;

i. Any disputes regarding the above or problems implementing this order shall be brought to the attention of the court through representative counsel after first consulting opposing counsel.

The Court has reviewed the parties' proposed Stipulation and Protective Order and, for good cause shown, HEREBY ORDERS that the parties' proposed Stipulation and Protective Order is APPROVED with the above-stated terms.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer