Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. LaForce, 1:19-cv-00479-LJO-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190917d45 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO PRIORITY BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS AND PROPOSED ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to L.R. 137 and L.R. 143, Plaintiff, the United States of America, and defendant the County of Stanislaus (Stanislaus County) agree as follows: 1. This Stipulation concerns the real property described in paragraph 9 of the United States' First Amended Complaint in this case. (ECF No. 6) The real property is known as the "Subject Property." The
More

STIPULATION TO PRIORITY BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS AND PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to L.R. 137 and L.R. 143, Plaintiff, the United States of America, and defendant the County of Stanislaus (Stanislaus County) agree as follows:

1. This Stipulation concerns the real property described in paragraph 9 of the United States' First Amended Complaint in this case. (ECF No. 6) The real property is known as the "Subject Property." The subject property is located within Stanislaus County.

2. Stanislaus County imposes property taxes upon the assessed value of real property within the County. Any Stanislaus County lien on the Subject Property shall remain until any and all real property taxes due and owing, along with all penalties and costs, are paid in full.

3. To the extent that property taxes imposed by Stanislaus County have become due and payable, but have not been paid, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6323(b)(6)) and California Revenue and Tax Code § 2192.1, those property taxes have priority over the United States' interest in the Subject Property. In the event the Subject Property is sold pursuant to an order of the Court, the United States agrees that proceeds of sale shall be applied to satisfy any property taxes, including all penalties and costs, on the Subject Property due and payable before being applied to satisfy the United States' liens or any other interest in the Subject Property.

4. The parties agree to bear their own costs and fees.

5. Stanislaus County received a copy of the United States' First Amended Complaint and was served with a summons (ECF No. 8), and agrees that this Court has jurisdiction over the res of the Subject Property.

6. Except as stated herein, Stanislaus County consents to judgment as requested in the United States' Complaint.

7. Stanislaus County was named as a defendant in this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7403(b). The United States claims no monetary relief against Stanislaus County in this action. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, Stanislaus County is excused from further participation in this case. Stanislaus County agrees to be bound by the judgment in this case, which shall incorporate the terms of this stipulation.

8. The United States and Stanislaus County jointly request the Court to approve this stipulation.

DATED this 13th day of September, 2019. Respectfully submitted, RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General /s/ Jonathan Hauck JONATHAN M. HAUCK Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-616-3173 (v) 202-307-0054 (f) Jonathan.m.hauck@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States of America /s/ Daniel Solish (as authorized via email on September 13, 2019) DANIEL SOLISH Deputy County Counsel Stanislaus County Counsel 1010 10th St., Suite 6400 Phone: 209-525-6376 Fax: 209-525-4473 Attorney for Stanislaus County

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer