Hodge v. Santiesteban, 1:19-cv-00341-LJO-SAB (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190924815
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AS MOOT [ECF No. 23] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Mark A. Hodge is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On September 20, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to have Defendants file a responsive pleading. Inasmuch as Plaintiff filed the same motion on September 18, 2019, which was denied on September 20, 2019, Plaintiff's current motion is
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AS MOOT [ECF No. 23] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Mark A. Hodge is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On September 20, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to have Defendants file a responsive pleading. Inasmuch as Plaintiff filed the same motion on September 18, 2019, which was denied on September 20, 2019, Plaintiff's current motion is d..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AS MOOT
[ECF No. 23]
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Mark A. Hodge is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 20, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to have Defendants file a responsive pleading. Inasmuch as Plaintiff filed the same motion on September 18, 2019, which was denied on September 20, 2019, Plaintiff's current motion is denied as duplicative.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
