Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stolz v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co., 2:18-cv-1923-KJM-KJN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191008u05 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER (ECF Nos. 105, 126) KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . In this case, the Court previously ordered Plaintiff to produce certain documents and respond to certain interrogatories by October 4, 2019. ( See ECF No. 121.) However, on September 27, counsel for Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw as attorney and set the matter for a hearing before District Judge Mueller on November 1, 2019. (ECF No. 122.) In light of this pending motion, the undersigned recognizes the difficult positio
More

ORDER

(ECF Nos. 105, 126)

In this case, the Court previously ordered Plaintiff to produce certain documents and respond to certain interrogatories by October 4, 2019. (See ECF No. 121.) However, on September 27, counsel for Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw as attorney and set the matter for a hearing before District Judge Mueller on November 1, 2019. (ECF No. 122.) In light of this pending motion, the undersigned recognizes the difficult position the parties are in regarding the Court's order regarding discovery. Thus, the Court orders the following:

1. Plaintiff Stolz is still required to pay the monetary sanctions as previously ordered. (See ECF No. 121, ordering Stolz to pay Travelers Counsel $1,225 in attorney fees).

2. All other discovery in this matter is stayed until the motion to withdraw has been resolved.

3. Once the district court has ruled on the withdrawal motion, the undersigned will set a status conference to discuss resuming discovery.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer