Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Howell v. Liddell, 2:19-cv-0578 TLN KJN P. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191008u28
Filed: Oct. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 1, 2019, the undersigned referred this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. (ECF No. 15.) This action is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Claire on October 10, 2019. Plaintiff is to appear at the settlement conference via video conferencing. (ECF No. 24.) On Oc
More

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 1, 2019, the undersigned referred this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. (ECF No. 15.) This action is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Claire on October 10, 2019. Plaintiff is to appear at the settlement conference via video conferencing. (ECF No. 24.)

On October 2, 2019, defendants filed a request to opt out of the ADR Project. (ECF No. 27.) Good cause appearing, defendants' request to opt out of the ADR Project is granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' request to opt out of the ADR Project (ECF No. 27) is granted;

2. The settlement conference set before Magistrate Judge Claire on October 10, 2019, is vacated;

3. The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for plaintiff to appear at the October 10, 2019 settlement conference via video conferencing (ECF No. 24) is vacated;

4. The stay in this action is lifted;

5. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's complaint within thirty days of the date of this order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer