Walrath v. Doan, 2:19-cv-0811 JAM DB PS. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191009g41
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 9, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Defendant ha
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 9, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Defendant has..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On July 9, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Defendant has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2019 (ECF No. 11) are adopted in full;
2. Defendant's May 8, 2019 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; and
3. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court.
Source: Leagle
