Jackson v. Mennitt,., 1:18-cv-01327-JDP. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191011m58
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER VACATING ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR ECF No. 18 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . On August 26, 2019, I referred this case for ADR, with the caveat that the parties would consult, and defendants would notify the court if ADR was unlikely to be productive. ECF No. 18. On September 23, 2019, defendants filed a request to opt out of ADR at this time. ECF No. 23. For good cause shown, defendant's request is granted and the order referring this case to post-screening
Summary: ORDER VACATING ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR ECF No. 18 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . On August 26, 2019, I referred this case for ADR, with the caveat that the parties would consult, and defendants would notify the court if ADR was unlikely to be productive. ECF No. 18. On September 23, 2019, defendants filed a request to opt out of ADR at this time. ECF No. 23. For good cause shown, defendant's request is granted and the order referring this case to post-screening A..
More
ORDER VACATING ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR
ECF No. 18
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
On August 26, 2019, I referred this case for ADR, with the caveat that the parties would consult, and defendants would notify the court if ADR was unlikely to be productive. ECF No. 18. On September 23, 2019, defendants filed a request to opt out of ADR at this time. ECF No. 23. For good cause shown, defendant's request is granted and the order referring this case to post-screening ADR, ECF No. 18, is hereby vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
