Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Najera v. Saul, 1:18-cv-01629-EPG. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191011m61 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF; ORDER ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, that this action be remanded for further administrative action pursuant to the Social Security Act 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law judge (
More

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, that this action be remanded for further administrative action pursuant to the Social Security Act § 205(g), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four.

On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for a new decision.

The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 9, 2019 PENA & BROMBERG, PLC /s/Jonathan O. Peña* (*as authorized via email on October 9, 2019) JONATHAN O. PENA, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: October 10, 2019 McGREGOR SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By: /s/Allison J. Cheung ALLISON J. CHEUNG Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the above Stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer