United States v. Flucas, 2:17-CR-209 KJM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191011m87
Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the natures of the documents filed under seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government's restitution evidence pertaining to a victim of defendant Rodney Flucas, and government's Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government, counsel fo
Summary: ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the natures of the documents filed under seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government's restitution evidence pertaining to a victim of defendant Rodney Flucas, and government's Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government, counsel for..
More
ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the natures of the documents filed under seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government's restitution evidence pertaining to a victim of defendant Rodney Flucas, and government's Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.
It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government, counsel for the defendant, and counsel's full-time employee staff.
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the government's request, sealing the government's motion serves a compelling interest. The Court further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by the government would be harmed. In light of the public filing of its request to seal, the Court further finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing the government's motion that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the government.
Source: Leagle
