Saniefar v. Moore, 1:17-cv-00823-LJO-BAM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191018868
Visitors: 32
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 56(d) or 6(b) AND LOCAL RULE 144(c) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . This Court has read and considered the papers submitted by the Parties in connection with Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Continue the Hearing on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. ECF Nos. 220 & 2
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 56(d) or 6(b) AND LOCAL RULE 144(c) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . This Court has read and considered the papers submitted by the Parties in connection with Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Continue the Hearing on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. ECF Nos. 220 & 22..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 56(d) or 6(b) AND LOCAL RULE 144(c)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
This Court has read and considered the papers submitted by the Parties in connection with Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Continue the Hearing on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. ECF Nos. 220 & 225. The Court finds good cause to grant the motion primarily because Plaintiff has indicated her intent to file a cross motion by the established dispositive filing deadline of November 22, 2019. For reasons of judicial efficiency, it therefore makes sense to continue the deadlines related to Defendants' motion so the cross motions can be decided together. Although Defendants do not agree with the factual premise(s) offered by Plaintiffs in support of the application to continue, Defendants nonetheless do not oppose a continuance. Therefore, the Court orders the following:
(i) That the hearing on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment be continued to December 20, 2019 and
(ii) That Plaintiff's Opposition thereto is due on or before December 6, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
