Cato v. Darst, 2:17-cv-01873 TLN EFB (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191021720
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Having reviewed Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Stay of Discovery, this Court finds good cause to grant Defendants' Motion for Stay of Discovery. Thus, if the Court denies Defendants' motion, once that decision becomes final, the parties shall have thirty (30) days' time from the date of the order denying summary judgment to serve responses to any pending discovery request served before the date of this Order.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
Having reviewed Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Stay of Discovery, this Court finds good cause to grant Defendants' Motion for Stay of Discovery. Thus, if the Court denies Defendants' motion, once that decision becomes final, the parties shall have thirty (30) days' time from the date of the order denying summary judgment to serve responses to any pending discovery request served before the date of this Order.
Source: Leagle
