Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Carefoot v. County of Kern, 1:17-cv-00456-AWI-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191023921 Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER TO FILE DISMISSAL DOCUMENTS JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court adopted the findings and recommendation to grant the petition for the minor's compromise. (Doc. 52.) In doing so, the Court ordered the parties "to file with the Court a stipulation for dismissal of the action with prejudice, and lodge a separate order, within 45 days of the date of service o
More

ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER TO FILE DISMISSAL DOCUMENTS

The Court adopted the findings and recommendation to grant the petition for the minor's compromise. (Doc. 52.) In doing so, the Court ordered the parties "to file with the Court a stipulation for dismissal of the action with prejudice, and lodge a separate order, within 45 days of the date of service of this Order." Id. at 2. Despite the expiration of the 45-day period, the parties have failed to comply. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

1. Within 14 days, the parties SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's order to file the stipulated dismissal and to lodge a separate order. Alternatively, they may file and lodge the overdue documents.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer