Filed: Oct. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on October 25, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant Marie Alcanter now moves to continue the status conference until November 22, 2019, and to exclude time between October 25, 2019, and November 22, 2019, under Local Code T4. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Co
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on October 25, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant Marie Alcanter now moves to continue the status conference until November 22, 2019, and to exclude time between October 25, 2019, and November 22, 2019, under Local Code T4. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Cou..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., Senior District Judge.
STIPULATION
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on October 25, 2019.
2. By this stipulation, defendant Marie Alcanter now moves to continue the status conference until November 22, 2019, and to exclude time between October 25, 2019, and November 22, 2019, under Local Code T4.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) On April 3, 2019, the government produced discovery associated with this case that consisted of over 3000 pages of documents, including investigative reports, bank records, photographs, and other types of records.
b) On April 17, 2019, the government produced over 5000 pages of additional discovery, including Cellebrite reports.
c) Counsel for defendant Marie Alcanter requires additional time to review the discovery, discuss it with her client, and obtain some additional records related to her client that counsel anticipates will take approximately one month to obtain.
d) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
e) The government does not object to the continuance.
f) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
g) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 25, 2019 to November 22, 2019, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
