United States v. Klipp, 2:14-cr-0107 GEB KJN P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191101g22
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Movant requests the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in 2255 proceedings. See, e.g., Irwin v. United States , 414 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1969). However, 18 U.S.C. 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. In the present case, the court does not find that the in
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Movant requests the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in 2255 proceedings. See, e.g., Irwin v. United States , 414 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1969). However, 18 U.S.C. 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. In the present case, the court does not find that the int..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Movant requests the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in § 2255 proceedings. See, e.g., Irwin v. United States, 414 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1969). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's requests for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 130 and 135) are denied without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
