Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Strojnik v. Shivkrupa Investments, Inc., 1:19-cv-01192-SKO. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191104b83 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Doc. 11) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On August 30, 2019, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the complaint in this case pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. (Doc. 1.) On October 7, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and on October 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a response. (Docs. 6, 10.) On October 30, 20
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(Doc. 11)

On August 30, 2019, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the complaint in this case pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (Doc. 1.) On October 7, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and on October 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a response. (Docs. 6, 10.)

On October 30, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to withdraw the pending motion to dismiss and for an extension of time until November 20, 2019 to file an answer to the complaint. (Doc. 11.) For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion. The motion to dismiss, (Doc. 6), is WITHDRAWN,1 and the motion hearing date of November 6, 2019, is VACATED.

Defendant SHALL respond to the complaint by no later than November 20, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes. (Docs. 4, 7.)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer