Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Villalobos v. Tiggs-Brown, 1:19-cv-00442-DAD-EPG. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191106a08 Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT STEPHEN SHELLANS, JR., WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 23) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Ramon Daniel Villalobos, and Defendants, Armenta Tiggs-Brown and Stephen Shellans, Jr., have filed a stipulation to dismiss Defendant Stephen Shellans, Jr., M.D., with prejudice (ECF No. 23). In light of the stipulation, the case against Defendant Stephan Shellans has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Defendant Stephan
More

ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT STEPHEN SHELLANS, JR., WITH PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 23)

Plaintiff, Ramon Daniel Villalobos, and Defendants, Armenta Tiggs-Brown and Stephen Shellans, Jr., have filed a stipulation to dismiss Defendant Stephen Shellans, Jr., M.D., with prejudice (ECF No. 23). In light of the stipulation, the case against Defendant Stephan Shellans has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Defendant Stephan Shellans. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is directed to designate the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) as terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer