Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Bilbro Construction Company, Inc., 1:18-cv-01519-DAD-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191107a53 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER CLOSING THE CASE (Doc. 20) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties report they have resolved this case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 20) The parties have settled their case and. (Doc. 10) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wils
More

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE (Doc. 20)

The parties report they have resolved this case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 20) The parties have settled their case and. (Doc. 10) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer