Ragan v. Richardson, 2:18-cv-0410 JAM KJN P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191112a68
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Pending before the court is petitioner's motion to stay this action in order to exhaust an additional claim. (ECF No. 17.) Petitioner's motion to stay is submitted for decision. Petitioner is not required to await resolution of his motion to stay before returning to state court to properly exhaust his state court remedies. In the event that petitioner exhausts his claim in the Californi
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Pending before the court is petitioner's motion to stay this action in order to exhaust an additional claim. (ECF No. 17.) Petitioner's motion to stay is submitted for decision. Petitioner is not required to await resolution of his motion to stay before returning to state court to properly exhaust his state court remedies. In the event that petitioner exhausts his claim in the California..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Pending before the court is petitioner's motion to stay this action in order to exhaust an additional claim. (ECF No. 17.) Petitioner's motion to stay is submitted for decision.
Petitioner is not required to await resolution of his motion to stay before returning to state court to properly exhaust his state court remedies. In the event that petitioner exhausts his claim in the California Supreme Court prior to this court's resolution of his request for a stay, petitioner is advised to file a notice of exhaustion in this court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
