Tou Christmas Thao v. Sherman, 2:17-cv-2396 MCE AC P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191121882
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 11, 2019, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action on grounds including untimeliness and non-exhaustion. See generally ECF No. 11. Petitioner has yet to file a r
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 11, 2019, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action on grounds including untimeliness and non-exhaustion. See generally ECF No. 11. Petitioner has yet to file a re..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 11, 2019, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action on grounds including untimeliness and non-exhaustion. See generally ECF No. 11. Petitioner has yet to file a response to the motion or to communicate with the court in any way.
In light of the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file a response to respondent's motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 11.
Petitioner is warned that failure to file a response to respondent's motion may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Source: Leagle
