Hopson v. Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California, 2:19-cv-01370 CKD. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191125925
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . On November 20, 2019 this matter was transferred to the undersigned for all purposes (ECF No. 8). The deadline for the parties' joint report contained in the present Order Requiring Service of Process and Joint Status Report (ECF No. 3) has passed. Accordingly, the parties are instructed to meet and confer as required by Fed R. Civ. P. 26(f) and submit to the court a joint status report as outlined in the court's previous order (ECF No. 3) with
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . On November 20, 2019 this matter was transferred to the undersigned for all purposes (ECF No. 8). The deadline for the parties' joint report contained in the present Order Requiring Service of Process and Joint Status Report (ECF No. 3) has passed. Accordingly, the parties are instructed to meet and confer as required by Fed R. Civ. P. 26(f) and submit to the court a joint status report as outlined in the court's previous order (ECF No. 3) withi..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
On November 20, 2019 this matter was transferred to the undersigned for all purposes (ECF No. 8). The deadline for the parties' joint report contained in the present Order Requiring Service of Process and Joint Status Report (ECF No. 3) has passed. Accordingly, the parties are instructed to meet and confer as required by Fed R. Civ. P. 26(f) and submit to the court a joint status report as outlined in the court's previous order (ECF No. 3) within 30 days of this order.
The court, upon review of the joint status report, may issue a scheduling order incorporating the suggestions of counsel as contained in the joint status report, or may set a status conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
