Fort v. Hatton, 2:18-cv-2603-JAM-EFB P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191206a93
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 29, 2019 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 29, 2019 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and ..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 29, 2019 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 29, 2019, are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied;
3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and
4. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
