Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Grantham, 2:18-cv-02785-TLN-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191210a25 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2019
Summary: JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's August 19, 2019 Minute Order, ECF No. 81, the parties submit the following proposal for further proceedings: 1. The parties respectfully request that the Court adopt the following schedule for summary judgment briefing, and adopt the indicated modifications to its standing order regarding page limits: a. Plaintiffs shall move for summary judgment by February 27, 2020, with a
More

JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER

Pursuant to the Court's August 19, 2019 Minute Order, ECF No. 81, the parties submit the following proposal for further proceedings:

1. The parties respectfully request that the Court adopt the following schedule for summary judgment briefing, and adopt the indicated modifications to its standing order regarding page limits: a. Plaintiffs shall move for summary judgment by February 27, 2020, with a memorandum limited to 25 pages. b. Federal Defendants shall file a combined Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and response to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment by March 26, 2020, in one memorandum limited to 25 pages. c. Defendant-Intervenor shall file a combined Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and response to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment by March 26, 2020, in one memorandum limited to 25 pages. d. Plaintiffs shall file their reply/opposition brief by April 16, 2020, limited to 15 pages. e. Federal Defendants shall file their reply by May 7, 2020, limited to 15 pages. f. Defendant-Intervenor shall file its reply by May 7, 2020, limited to 15 pages. 2. The parties request that the Court set a hearing for oral argument on summary judgment on May 28, 2020, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon as practicable thereafter compatible with the Court's schedule.

The Court having considered the parties' Joint Proposed Schedule for Further Proceedings, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer