ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action. Pending before the court is plaintiffs' ex parte application for an order shortening time (ECF No. 290). Plaintiffs seek an order shortening time for hearing their motion for leave to take depositions in excess of 10.

Plaintiffs' request is governed by Eastern District of California Local Rule 144(e), which provides that ex parte applications to shorten time "will not be granted except upon affidavit of counsel showing a satisfactory explanation for the need for the issuance of such an order and for the failure of counsel to obtain a stipulation for the issuance of such an order from other counsel or parties in the action." Here, plaintiff's ex parte application is not accompanied by any affidavit or declaration from counsel, and the memorandum filed in support of the ex parte application makes no showing as to why plaintiffs' motion relating to excess deposition cannot be heard on regular notice pursuant to Local Rule 251(a).1

Plaintiffs' motion relating to excess depositions was served and filed with sufficient notice under Rule 251(a) for a hearing on January 15, 2020, before the undersigned in Redding, California. The matter will be set for hearing on that date at 10:00 a.m. The court declines defendants' invitation to exempt plaintiff's motion relating to excess depositions from the requirements of Local Rule 251. See Local Rule 251(b) (providing that "any motion to exceed discovery limitations . . . shall not be heard" unless the parties meet and confer and file a joint statement). The parties' joint statement regarding leave to take excess depositions shall be filed within the time provided in Local Rule 251(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs' ex parte application (ECF No. 290) is denied;

2. Plaintiff's motion relating to excess depositions (ECF No. 288) is set for hearing on January 15, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., before the undersigned in Redding, California;

3. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the discovery dispute, as required by Local Rule 251(b), and file a joint statement, as required by Local Rule 251(c), on or before January 8, 2020; and

4. Telephonic appearances are not allowed unless the court approves a written request for telephonic appearance showing good cause for excusing a personal appearance.